I agree, Trace. It helps when it is posted for everyone to understand so that we can all make better decisions on what we agree or disagree with in regards to the candidates' views.
Gobbledygook looks about right

I do like that under Obama's plan it will cover considerably more of the uninsured and offer more services than McCain's plan.
A couple more important facts:
nearly 20 million people will get LESS insurance options through employers under McCain's plan that have coverage now
Obama's plan is based on a large "national pool" of insurance, which will not discriminate based on current health status.
That one effects me personally. Well, my hubby, actually, so that makes me VERY happy! But I'm sure if not positive that it effects a vast amount of the uninsured.
Please, when quoting be sure to include the entire quote:
The summary below is simply my watered down version of a summary by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), and is not my own "spin" on the plans. The results are as expressed by an EPI Memorandum of the research conducted by the TPC, dated May 23, 2008. EPI is an independent economic analysis research firm. In a nutshell:
1) Obama's plan costs more (20% more; or 1.6 trillion versus McCain's 1.3 trillion)
2) McCain's plan would provide incentives for private insurance, but would discourage employers from providing coverage to employees (20 million less will have coverage from their employers over the next 10 years)
3) McCain's plan covers only 5% more of the current uninsured, while Obama's plan covers 47% of the uninsured (42% more coverage for only 20% more in cost; you do the math!)
While Obama's budget requires the U.S. to spend about 20 percent more on healthcare than McCain's plan, Obama's plan provides more "bang-for-the-buck", covers more of the uninsured and underinsured, and offers more services than the McCain plan.
Obama's plan is based on a large "national pool" of insurance, which will not discriminate based on current health status. This is probably the biggest flaw I see in the system (but what the heck do I know I'm not an economic analyst after all). I do see, however, the potential for fluctuating health care rates to potentially hike far higher than anticipated, given a national pool with no discriminating conditions.