MyCSSMenu Save Document Sweepstakes Advantage Online Forum
May 24, 2012, 04:59:58 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News:
 
  Sweepstakes   Home   Blogs Help Arcade Login Register Chat  

Pages: [1]   sort down
  Print  
Author Topic: Senate Victory for Broadcaster Freedom  (Read 315 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« on: February 27, 2009, 02:32:27 AM »

Quote
The U.S. Senate today scored a major victory for broadcaster freedom.  As we’ve been reporting to you, Sen. DeMint had introduced an amendment stating that the FCC shall not have the authority to prescribe any rule, regulation, policy, doctrine, standard, guideline, or other requirement that has the purpose or effect of reinstating or repromulgating (in whole or part) the Fairness Doctrine or any similar requirement that broadcasters meet programming quotas or guidelines for issues of public importance.  Simply put, Sen. Demint’s Amendment prohibits the FCC from requiring broadcasters to always air both sides of a controversial issue.

During debate, Sen. Durbin was able to secure slightly wider latitude for the FCC in terms of mandatory local programming such as news and weather, but the central components of the DeMint Amendment remained in tact.  In the end, the DeMint Amendment passed by an overwhelming 87-11 majority in the Senate.  This is a tremendous victory and we're grateful to you for standing with us and for Sen. DeMint's outstanding leadership through this process.

Our attention now focuses on ensuring that the DeMint language remains intact through the legislative process.  The House of Representatives will get its turn at the bill, after which a House/Senate conference committee will be responsible for ironing out the differences in the two bills.  After this is complete, President Obama will sign it into law.

Finally, even after this language becomes law, we must remain vigilant to ensure that the FCC does not use its authority to encourage diversity of ownership as a back-door means of censoring speech over the airwaves.  This will be an equally important and difficult battle.  For today, however, we're very pleased with this positive development.
]/QUOTE]

http://www.aclj.org/LegislativeAlert/Read.aspx?GUID=12ddf59a-d2ef-48a4-9528-1f3dd03a98eb
Logged
lidarkside
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6574




Mood:Loved
Loved




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2009, 03:05:37 AM »

So, does this mean that their rights to spread propaganda are protected! laughing

I'll stick to short-wave radio programming for my news! headbang
Logged
gosweepwin
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2823






Ignore
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2009, 05:03:57 AM »

As I understand it, the Fairness Doctrine was enacted during a time when media outlets were more limited than they are today.  The idea was that an audience deserved to hear both sides of an argument.  Imagine, having no tv and a radio that only picked up Rush Limbaugh or Keith Olbermann.  This would give you a very lopsided view of the news you received.  Ronald Reagan did away with the Fairness Doctrine in the 1980's in the belief that US citizens had access to multiple media outlets and many viewpoints.  There has been talk lately of reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine, but it appears that our senators had the common sense to see it as an outdated an unnecessary restriction.
Logged
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2009, 05:31:40 AM »

it appears that our senators had the common sense to see it as an outdated an unnecessary restriction.

Thank God
Logged
Pages: [1]   sort up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!