MyCSSMenu Save Document Sweepstakes Advantage Online Forum
February 09, 2012, 09:44:25 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
News:
 
  Sweepstakes   Home   Blogs Help Arcade Login Register Chat  

Pages: [1]   sort down
  Print  
Author Topic: Vaccine Court: Autism Debate Continues  (Read 867 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« on: March 01, 2009, 11:15:56 PM »

Quote
Summary:
Generation Rescue Press Release:

Government Again Concedes Vaccines Cause Autism

Mysterious Vaccine Court created in 1986 by the pharmaceutical industry, with the support of Congress, rules in favor of Bailey Banks against HHS.

Los Angeles – February 24, 2009 – Generation Rescue, Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey’s Los Angeles-based non-profit autism organization, today announced that the United States Government has once again conceded that vaccines cause autism. The announcement comes on the heels of the recently unsealed court case of Bailey Banks vs. HHS. The ruling states, “The Court found that Bailey would not have suffered this delay but for the administration of the MMR vaccine…a proximate sequence of cause and effect leading inexorably from vaccination to PDD [Autism].”

In a curious and hypocritical method of operation, the mysterious Vaccine Court not only protects vaccine makers from liability but supports a policy that has tripled the number of vaccines given to U.S. children – all after being made aware of the fact that these vaccines do, in fact, cause autism and repeatedly ruling in favor of families with children hurt by their vaccines.

“It was heartbreaking to hear about Bailey’s story, but through this ruling we are gaining the proof we need to open the eyes of the world to the fact that vaccines do, in fact, cause autism,” said Jenny McCarthy, Hollywood actress, autism activist, best-selling author and Generation Rescue board member. “Bailey Banks’ regression into autism after vaccination is the same story I went through with my own son and the same story I have heard from thousands of mothers and fathers around the country. Our hope is that this ruling will influence decision and policy-makers to help the hundreds of thousands of children and families affected by this terrible condition.”

Banks vs. HHS is the second known case where the Vaccine Court could not deny the overwhelming evidence showing vaccines caused a child’s autism. The first was the case of Hannah Poling in March of 2008, where the court found in her favor and awarded her family compensation.

Jim Carrey, Hollywood legend and Generation Rescue board member, reacted to the news, “It seems the U.S. government is sending mixed messages by telling the world that vaccines don’t cause autism, while, at the same time, they are quietly managing a separate ‘vaccine court’ that is ruling in favor of affected families and finding that vaccines, in fact, were the cause. For most of the autism community the question is no longer whether vaccines caused of their child’s autism. The question is why is their government only promoting the rulings that are in favor of the vaccine companies.”

Why is a secret court, which no one knows about or understands, quietly paying these families for vaccine injuries and autism? Deirdre Imus, Generation Rescue board member and founder of the Deirdre Imus Environmental Center for Pediatric Oncology says, “Over the past 20 years, the vaccine court has dispensed close to $2 billion in compensation to families whose children were injured or killed by a vaccine. I am not against vaccines and my own child has been vaccinated. But, I share the growing concerns of many parents questioning the number of vaccines given to children today, some of the toxic ingredients in vaccines, and whether we know enough about the combination risks associated with the multiple vaccines given to children during critical developmental windows.”

To help spread the word of the Banks ruling, Generation Rescue also bought a full-page ad that will run in the USA Today on 02/25/2009, which has a daily circulation of 2,272,815.

Generation Rescue seeks to answer these questions and many more on a daily basis as they fight for the truth and to recover children with autism around the world. To learn more please visit www.generationrescue.org, write to media@generationrescue.com

About Generation Rescue
Generation Rescue is an international movement of scientists, physicians and parent-volunteers researching the causes and treatments for autism and helping thousands of children begin biomedical treatment.

http://gnn.tv/headlines/19763/Vaccine_Court_Autism_Debate_Continues

Good thingf we know the truth. I guess they can't figure it out. What is the truth?
Logged
lidarkside
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6575




Mood:Loved
Loved




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2009, 11:23:30 PM »

I was already up to speed on this back in the '90's.

After proof that products, vaccines included, containing thermasol increased the risk of the development of autism, pharmaceutical companies started to quietly remove it from their products such as eye drops for example.  Yet, they never removed it from the vaccinations given to children.

Now, why is that? scratch
Logged
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2009, 11:33:24 PM »

I was aware of it also but just recently I think there was something saying the opposite. There's the drug companies wanting to keep us sick I guess.
Logged
lidarkside
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6575




Mood:Loved
Loved




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2009, 12:01:18 AM »

They've been trying to say the opposite ever since this information got out years ago.

For years now, people have been questioning their continued use of thermasol in vaccinations when they know the dangers of it.

The government has been, for some time now, trying to mandate these vaccinations since many parents have been opting out of having their children vaccinated with this garbage.

Keep us sick?  What other reasons can they have for removing it from just about everything but childrens' vaccinations--creates a lot of special-needs programs and more dependency these government-funded programs not to mention medicaid.
Logged
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2009, 12:10:00 AM »

I remember when my girls were babies that was the first time I heard about vaccines causing problems but there was no such thing as autism. What I want to know is why are there so many cases of autism? I also think it has something to do with the foods we feed our children now. I just don't think we had all this ADD and ADHD back then. I guess all the little boys were just being boys LOL.
Logged
lidarkside
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6575




Mood:Loved
Loved




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2009, 12:23:57 AM »

I don't believe it has anything to do with the food we eat.

ADD and ADHD came about to label hyper and super-hyper children that couldn't focus enough in school to be successfully "conditioned".  This way, they had an excuse to dope them up so that they could be conditioned into the group-think along with the others.

During the '90's there was a major increase in this so-called ADD and ADHD, asthma, autism, child diabetes, and other child-related ailments.

With asthma, the problem seems to have coincided with houses being built with thicker walls than older houses making them more airtight.  That combined with people just not opening their windows up everyday like they used to years ago and still should resulted in many children becoming asthmatic.

If you ever want to have a shocker, get your hands on the book(s) of childrens' mental and medical disorders.  You wouldn't believe some of the things in there.  It's like they're making it up as they go along.

I know two sets of parents with mildly autistic children, and they believe it resulted from the vaccinations given to their children.

Logged
tharedhead
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2097




Mood:Indescribable
Indescribable

I am a cabbage


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2009, 08:20:38 PM »

Speaking of diet...I'm interested in the baby formula lacking certain essential fatty acids..

http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/16

Quote
Absence of breastfeeding when compared to breastfeeding for more than six months was significantly associated with an increase in the odds of having autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.42, 4.35) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01, 3.78). Use of infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid supplementation versus exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a significant increase in the odds of autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.24, 15.7) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 12.96, 95% CI 1.27, 132).

Conclusion
The results of this preliminary study indicate that children who were not breastfed or were fed infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid supplementation were significantly more likely to have autistic disorder.

Logged
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2009, 11:05:19 PM »

Speaking of diet...I'm interested in the baby formula lacking certain essential fatty acids..

http://www.internationalbreastfeedingjournal.com/content/1/1/16

Quote
Absence of breastfeeding when compared to breastfeeding for more than six months was significantly associated with an increase in the odds of having autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.42, 4.35) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01, 3.78). Use of infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid supplementation versus exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a significant increase in the odds of autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.24, 15.7) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 12.96, 95% CI 1.27, 132).

Conclusion
The results of this preliminary study indicate that children who were not breastfed or were fed infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid supplementation were significantly more likely to have autistic disorder.


Interesting. I could see how that might make sense. I nursed both my girls for awhile. I knew it was the best thing for them.
Logged
tharedhead
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2097




Mood:Indescribable
Indescribable

I am a cabbage


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2009, 12:03:01 AM »

Omega 3 Fatty Acids also have effects on the immune system, which could (I conjecture) have an effect on the reaction to vaccines or other environmental challenges. Personally, I tend to think its a LOT of things, since we've made such major changes in human diet, lifestyle and exposure to various toxins-the synergistic effect is hard to quantify

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0887/is_4_23/ai_n6170881
Quote
The fatty acid composition of plasma phospholipids and neutrophils was dramatically altered by supplementation with EPA or DHA, and the effects of EPA differed notably from those of DHA. DHA supplementation decreased T lymphocyte activation, as assessed by the expression of CD69, whereas EPA supplementation had no significant effect. Neither the EPA-rich oil nor the DHA-rich oil had any significant effect on monocyte or neutrophil phagocytosis or on cytokine production or adhesion molecule expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

And, of course, doctors diagnosing for any new disease or disorder they may have a drug for...
Logged
cinphi
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5056




Mood:Loved
Loved

It Is Well With My Soul




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2009, 12:09:03 AM »

I agree. A lot of things have changed over the last 50 years or so.
Logged
lidarkside
SA Member
SA Gold Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6575




Mood:Loved
Loved




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2009, 12:41:09 AM »

Speaking of formula, doctors started to push soy formulas on babies who had a tendency to spit up/throw up a lot.  Soy formula is supposed to be used for a very, very short term for babies who do this excessively.  However, doctors started telling mothers to put their babies on soy formula for even a little spitting and throwing up and also had them keep them on it throughout it through their infancy.  The result of this was a lot of lactose-intolerant children.

My second son spit up and threw up excessively, but I didn't bother mentioning it to his doctor knowing exactly what he would tell me to do.  Even though I breast fed, I had to supplement with formula since I couldn't keep up with the amount he ate.  After awhile, the throwing up and spitting up stopped, and he can eat all the dairy he wants.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2009, 01:38:40 AM by LIDARKSIDE » Logged
Pages: [1]   sort up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!