Governor Sarah Palin

Status
Not open for further replies.
All I hear from all of them if fluff and stuff...I am really disheartened with this election and the whole process. I know I will vote in November, but I don't see a single thing changing and it just is really a bummer. Not one of them really cares what we think! As soon as they get in office they will forget that we even exist.

People always talk about the separation of church and state and I think the bigger issue is the separation of the elected and the people they serve. They are all up in our face during the campaign and then we don't see or hear from them again until their 2/4 year term is up ~ I'm sorry, but something is wrong with this picture. Everyone of them can talk to me until they are blue in the face, but none of them understand the day to day troubles of the common man! Even if they have been there at one time, they are not now and have totally forgotten what it is like to live paycheck to paycheck. Common sense politics needs to make a stand somewhere and I don't see it anywhere in these elections...

Okay ~ stepping down from the soapbox now...
 
well the polls will certainly change after the debates.. I dont see how Palin has helped. She hasnt really said anything. she isnt doing interviews. Which in itself is odd. What are they so afraid of? Her showing her total lack of knowledge about important issues like.. oh, I dont know.. foreign policy.



And I agree they forget about the little guy. I think its hard once they get in there to actually fight all the bureaucracy. And its hard to see where normal people are coming from when you have never had to worry about anything. Did you hear about the amount of money Cindy McCain's outfit was the night of the republican convention? roughly 300,000... Yeah, they understand not being able to make your mortgage payment or buy gas and groceries . wait, thats right.. Mccain didnt even know how many homes they own. :error:
 
All I hear from all of them if fluff and stuff...I am really disheartened with this election and the whole process. I know I will vote in November, but I don't see a single thing changing and it just is really a bummer. Not one of them really cares what we think! As soon as they get in office they will forget that we even exist.

People always talk about the separation of church and state and I think the bigger issue is the separation of the elected and the people they serve. They are all up in our face during the campaign and then we don't see or hear from them again until their 2/4 year term is up ~ I'm sorry, but something is wrong with this picture. Everyone of them can talk to me until they are blue in the face, but none of them understand the day to day troubles of the common man! Even if they have been there at one time, they are not now and have totally forgotten what it is like to live paycheck to paycheck. Common sense politics needs to make a stand somewhere and I don't see it anywhere in these elections...

Okay ~ stepping down from the soapbox now...

I can certainly understand where you are coming from and yes politics will always be just that politics. They want our vote no doubt and it's hard when we know the country has a lot of things that need attention. The one thing I do like about Govenor Palin is that I can relate to the fact that she is somewhat like regular people and I can see her having lived pay check to pay check. We are deffinately not going to find that perfect person to fix the mess we as a country have all put ourselves in but we have to try and vote for the person we feel will do the best job.

You said yourself that you will vote so that's good that you are concerned about our nation. Just maybe try and vote your conscience. I mean it's both parties that have performed badly. Congress has an approval rating of 9% and it's a democratic congress. I guess I just have faith in our country and we will pull through somehow.
 
well the polls will certainly change after the debates.. I dont see how Palin has helped. She hasnt really said anything. she isnt doing interviews. Which in itself is odd. What are they so afraid of? Her showing her total lack of knowledge about important issues like.. oh, I dont know.. foreign policy.



And I agree they forget about the little guy. I think its hard once they get in there to actually fight all the bureaucracy. And its hard to see where normal people are coming from when you have never had to worry about anything. Did you hear about the amount of money Cindy McCain's outfit was the night of the republican convention? roughly 300,000... Yeah, they understand not being able to make your mortgage payment or buy gas and groceries . wait, thats right.. Mccain didnt even know how many homes they own. :error:

She will be doing her first interview but I forget with which network. It will be this week I believe :)
 
A conserative Democrat woman living in the South just don't stand a chance :crazytongue:
 

Quoting from article in link:

Rick Davis, McCain's campaign manager, told Fox News today that Palin wouldn't subject herself to any tough questions from reporters "until the point in time when she'll be treated with respect and deference."

Davis shrugged off the criticism and said Palin would do interviews, "When we think it's time and when she feels comfortable doing it."

"She's not scared to answer questions. But you know what? We run our campaign, not the news media. And we'll do things on our timetable," Davis said.


Let's see. Where do I start? :laughing:

Palin not subjecting herself to tough questions. Why, one may ask? Well, not until she's treated with respect AND deference.

Definition of deference: Main Entry: def·er·ence
Pronunciation: \ˈde-fə-rən(t)s, ˈdef-rən(t)s\
Function: noun
Date: 1660
: respect and esteem due a superior or an elder; also : affected or ingratiating regard for another's wishes
synonyms see honor
— in deference to : in consideration of <returned early in deference to her parents' wishes>

She's not that old so the elder situation is out. So she's got a superiority complex. Already. The truth would be that Palin isn't prepared to answer tough questions until her answers have been scripted for her. She's not wanting to be in the hot seat and answer questions honestly. Why? Because she'd cost McCain the presidency and herself the VP. Plain and simple.

The one thing I do like about Govenor Palin is that I can relate to the fact that she is somewhat like regular people and I can see her having lived pay check to pay check.

What in the world? Ahahahahaha!! How can you see that and just what exactly are you seeing? :scratch:

Everyone of them can talk to me until they are blue in the face, but none of them understand the day to day troubles of the common man!

Can I get an amen!!

Good idea of where the polls are yes Govenor Palin has helped

Depends on your definition of "help." Sarah isn't helping because people necessarily agree with her nazi-type views. She's simply helping because she's a woman. McCain knew there'd be people dense enough to equate her with Hilary. You know, Hilary being a woman and all. I'd give him points for smarts if I wasn't thoroughly disgusted and offended. Not to mention insulted and nauseous.

I believe she has more experience than Obama does

How so and in doing what? Breeding? Yeah, I'd agree. Not that breeding has anything to do with it.

This women says everything I think about Palin.. http://www.mommytrackd.com/sarah-palin?page=0,0 from a blog.. mommytrack. Some of the comments are harsh IMO.. She isnt bashing women, she is bashing the fact that this woman is unqualified for the job. period.

A quote from the article:

It makes sense why John McCain would pick a woman for a running mate. For one thing, it allows him to have a “historical” campaign, too. And of course, if you’re going to try to go after all of those still-undecided, bitter, Hillary Clinton supporters, what better way to woo them than with another woman who can fulfill the dream they thought they’d lost? But for me, that’s where the logic ends. Because the only thing that Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have in common is that they both have vaginas. I mean, is John McCain serious? He thinks he can woo Hillary voters with a pro-life, gun-toting, anti-gay hockey mom whose political resume includes the PTA? Please. If John McCain really wanted to make history, there were a lot of women he could have chosen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson, of Texas. Christine Todd Whitman, of New Jersey. Even Carly Fiorina of Hewlett Packard or Meg Whitman of e-Bay would have been better choices. But instead, he chose a woman who couldn’t be less experienced. He chose a woman whom nobody has heard of. He chose a woman whom many will find it difficult to take seriously in an international, or even a national, arena.

I couldn't have said it better myself! *claps hands*

Someone tell me why Sarah is SOOO great for the United States of America? And don't say, "I think she's great" or "I share her views" or "she looks great in glasses." I want a legitimate reason because I can't find one and that's after putting aside my oppositional views.
 
Deference? what an odd choice of words.. :scratch: they dont want her talking until she has been schooled big time. I cant wait to see the interview. Id be willing to bet that there wont be any really hard questions for her. Thats probably why they got the interview..

Its going to be an interesting race to say the least.
 
Deference? what an odd choice of words.. :scratch: they dont want her talking until she has been schooled big time. I cant wait to see the interview. Id be willing to bet that there wont be any really hard questions for her. Thats probably why they got the interview..

Its going to be an interesting race to say the least.

I am also looking forward to the interview :)
 
Deference? what an odd choice of words.. :scratch: they dont want her talking until she has been schooled big time. I cant wait to see the interview. Id be willing to bet that there wont be any really hard questions for her. Thats probably why they got the interview..

Its going to be an interesting race to say the least.

Couldn't agree more.

And cin, if you want to be taken seriously you must be willing to explain yourself. Your attempt at a point is mute otherwise. I'm 32 and your 50 something. I think we could have an adult discussion if you'd be so kind as to answer the questions :)
 
Lighten up, people. Some of these replies are not political discussion; they are an attack on the member offering an opinion. We all have our reasons for prefering one ticket over the other. I'm not going to tell you who I'm voting for or why. But I'm voting and hope you all do the same. Pick the ticket you like best. I would rather see this thread telling us why you LIKE your choice rather than how stupid you think everyone is who is voting for the other party.

Please steer this discussion in a more positive direction or I'll have to be the meanie, and mothball this thread. Thank you.
 
Lighten up, people. Some of these replies are not political discussion; they are an attack on the member offering an opinion. We all have our reasons for prefering one ticket over the other. I'm not going to tell you who I'm voting for or why. But I'm voting and hope you all do the same. Pick the ticket you like best. I would rather see this thread telling us why you LIKE your choice rather than how stupid you think everyone is who is voting for the other party.

Please steer this discussion in a more positive direction or I'll have to be the meanie, and mothball this thread. Thank you.

:) You're not a meanie. Just curious what exactly does mothballing this thread mean? :laughing: I know what mothballs are for but I have never heard this used in any way.
 
When a battleship is taken out of active service, it is "mothballed". It is then sent back the shipyard, where it sits empty. Honestly, I'd rather not pull this thread. I would like to know why people like a candidate. Even what you don't like about a candidate would be okay. But making disparaging remarks about others for not liking the same candidate that you do, or not liking your reasons, is not cool.
 
When a battleship is taken out of active service, it is "mothballed". It is then sent back the shipyard, where it sits empty. Honestly, I'd rather not pull this thread. I would like to know why people like a candidate. Even what you don't like about a candidate would be okay. But making disparaging remarks about others for not liking the same candidate that you do, or not liking your reasons, is not cool.

OK thanks for the explanation.

I will say as far as both presidential candidates go I of course admire and respect John McCain for his service to his country. Country first and also because I feel he has the experience to make good judgment calls if needed. He has views that line up with mine because I support the republican platform. I am impressed with Palin because she has shown she has the experience to run a state and she is willing to cross party lines to try and also put country/state first. They compliment each other and I believe they would be the two to reform government. I also prefer McCain's plans like drill now and his medical plan.

As for Obama and Bidon I honestly think he needs more experience before he can be POTUS. His past track record in the senate concern me because he only voted present. For the most part anyways. Bidon is more along the lines of McCain's way of thinking even as far as the war in Iraq. Obama has based his campaign on change but in the last several months he has changed his mind and he now looks just like any other politician. His history with his friends has concerned me and his deciding not to take public funds when he said he would just shows untrustworthyness.

Well those are some of my opinions on both sides oh accept I believe Obama will raise taxes on the middle class also and not just the rich. Taxes will go up no matter what.

This has been an exciting race. A woman and an African American are ruining.
 
You know, this thread is exactly what is wrong with American Politics. Attacking the individual rather than the issue clouds everything. It's the same in the campaigns. Seriously, what do we really know about the candidates positions? What we do know about the candidates and about the members posting in her is what they don't like about others. I am really tired of this approach..

I too would like to know why people like their candidates of choice. As of now, I am voting for none of the above. :cry:

:scratch: Hmmmm, understanding each other or each of the candidates, what a refreshing idea!
 
Wolfie I think it would be so wonderful if we could get to know what the issues are with the candidates and stop all the attacks. I hope that as the next couple months speed by we may have a clearer understanding of what they will do for us. Right now I think a lot of it is just trying to get our votes but if we can just get to the root of what they are all about then maybe we will be able to make an informed vote come November. Election years are always so crazy.
 
You're right, but they are really big IFS! We will never get the answers. And,even if we do, does it really matter. Honestly, how much can the president do without the support of congress.

What frustrates me are the electoral college and the concept of the super delegates. Honestly, I want my vote counted equally to yours. I want my reps to have the same say in our leadership as I do. Why do the superdelegates get to decide? I think our system is ridiculous. It is not a government of the people for the people. Honestly, it no longer exists.

Lately, all I can think of is the old Richard Pryor movie. "Brewster's Millions." I want to cast my vote for None of the Above! :headbang:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top